• Menu
  • Skip to right header navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Raleigh-Divorce-Lawyers.com

Building Lifelong Relationships... One Client at a Time.

  • Home
  • Start Here
    • Read This First
    • Do you need a divorce lawyer?
    • What to Do if Your Spouse Won’t Leave
    • The Truth about Divorce in North Carolina
    • What is a Legal Separation?
    • Initial Consult Questions
    • The Cost of Divorce
    • Therapists We Recommend
    • NC Family Law Blog
  • Services
    • Initial Assessment
    • Separation Agreements
    • Divorce Mediation
    • Absolute Divorce
    • Alimony in NC
    • Property Division
    • Child Custody
    • Child Support
    • Collaborative Divorce
    • Divorce from Bed and Board
  • Client Portal
  • Home
  • Start Here
    • Read This First
    • Do you need a divorce lawyer?
    • What to Do if Your Spouse Won’t Leave
    • The Truth about Divorce in North Carolina
    • What is a Legal Separation?
    • Initial Consult Questions
    • The Cost of Divorce
    • Therapists We Recommend
    • NC Family Law Blog
  • Services
    • Initial Assessment
    • Separation Agreements
    • Divorce Mediation
    • Absolute Divorce
    • Alimony in NC
    • Property Division
    • Child Custody
    • Child Support
    • Collaborative Divorce
    • Divorce from Bed and Board
  • Client Portal
  • Home
  • Start Here
  • Services
  • Client Portal

NC Child Custody – Best interests of the child… What is that?

May 17, 2010 //  by James//  3 Comments

As a practicing attorney, I really enjoy clear, well defined statutes that give me good sense of what my client needs to do to win their case (if and when it makes its way into the courtroom).  One of the most highly litigated areas of divorce law in NC is child custody – and unfortunately, the NC Child Custody laws do not give us a clear definition of what factors the court will consider when deciding what is in the best interests of the child.

I’ve compiled my own list here of things that I believe are important in making a determination of this nature:

(a)  The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child relationship, to honor the time-sharing schedule, and to be reasonable when changes are required.

(b)  The anticipated division of parental responsibilities after the litigation, including the extent to which parental responsibilities will be delegated to third parties.

(c)  The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to determine, consider, and act upon the needs of the child as opposed to the needs or desires of the parent.

(d)  The length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity.

(e)  The geographic viability of the parenting plan, with special attention paid to the needs of school-age children and the amount of time to be spent traveling to effectuate the parenting plan. This factor does not create a presumption for or against relocation of either parent with a child.

(f)  The moral fitness of the parents.

(g)  The mental and physical health of the parents.

(h)  The home, school, and community record of the child.

(i)  The reasonable preference of the child, if the court deems the child to be of sufficient intelligence, understanding, and experience to express a preference.

(j)  The demonstrated knowledge, capacity, and disposition of each parent to be informed of the circumstances of the minor child, including, but not limited to, the child’s friends, teachers, medical care providers, daily activities, and favorite things.

(k)  The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to provide a consistent routine for the child, such as discipline, and daily schedules for homework, meals, and bedtime.

(l)  The demonstrated capacity of each parent to communicate with and keep the other parent informed of issues and activities regarding the minor child, and the willingness of each parent to adopt a unified front on all major issues when dealing with the child.

(m)  Evidence of domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, regardless of whether a prior or pending action relating to those issues has been brought. If the court accepts evidence of prior or pending actions regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect, the court must specifically acknowledge in writing that such evidence was considered when evaluating the best interests of the child.

(n)  Evidence that either parent has knowingly provided false information to the court regarding any prior or pending action regarding domestic violence, sexual violence, child abuse, child abandonment, or child neglect.

(o)  The particular parenting tasks customarily performed by each parent and the division of parental responsibilities before the institution of litigation and during the pending litigation, including the extent to which parenting responsibilities were undertaken by third parties.

(p)  The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to participate and be involved in the child’s school and extracurricular activities.

(q)  The demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to maintain an environment for the child which is free from substance abuse.

(r)  The capacity and disposition of each parent to protect the child from the ongoing litigation as demonstrated by not discussing the litigation with the child, not sharing documents or electronic media related to the litigation with the child, and refraining from disparaging comments about the other parent to the child.

(s)  The developmental stages and needs of the child and the demonstrated capacity and disposition of each parent to meet the child’s developmental needs.

(t)  Any other factor that is relevant to the determination of a specific parenting plan, including the time-sharing schedule.

For the record, I wish I could take credit for compiling this list on my own, but alas… I cannot.  As a lawyer who used to practice family law in Florida, I must confess that these are the factors that can be found in Florida Statutes Chapter 61.13.

Category: Child Custody, Child Support, Divorce - General, Practical AdviceTag: Child Custody, Child Support, Custody, custody litigation, divorce

Previous Post: « Consumer Bankruptcy Guide
Next Post: How do you decide who moves? »

Primary Sidebar

Next Steps Divorce Book
NC Divorce Lawyer
  • NC Divorce Laws
  • Alimony
  • Child Support
  • Child Custody
  • Collaborative Divorce
  • Uncontested Divorce
  • Legal Separation
  • Absolute Divorce
  • Equitable Distribution
  • Separation Agreements

About Our Firm

The Hart Law Firm, P.A. was originally founded in 2005 as a divorce and family law firm in Orlando, Florida. We moved to North Carolina in 2010, and now work with families to help them navigate the process of separation and divorce.

The Hart Law Firm is conveniently located in Cary, NC. We provide services throughout North Carolina’s Triangle area including Raleigh, Apex, Holly Springs, Garner, Morrisville, Durham, Research Triangle Park, Chapel Hill, Carrboro, Wake Forest, Wake County, Durham County, Orange County and other nearby cities and towns.

Next Steps Divorce Book
  • Home
  • Start Here
  • Services
  • Client Portal

Copyright © 2023 Raleigh-divorce-lawyers.com · All Rights Reserved